1. No matter what kind of seawall you put in Manila Bay how strong you reinforce, it will just get eventually washed by the strong waves, just like what happens now during heavy rains and winds. The culprit is that the side of the sea facing the Baywalk does not have coastal protection, that is the breakwater.

    Breakwaters protect the harbor from strong waves, dissipating energy and momentum from the waves before it reaches the harbor, keeping harbors safe from flooding and tsunamis. But even nature has its own set of coastal defenses.

    Mangrove forests also offer the same coastal protection Breakwater Structure does. Manila derived itself from a Mangrove (Ixora manila in Blanco’s Flora), but urbanization decimated those reserves in the Pasig. And I don’t think we could bring back the mangroves in Manila Bay, the bayside has been pulled out of proportion already. 

     
  1. mackycheese reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  2. ynitsed08 reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  3. centimeters likes this
  4. badoodlesniken said: And I think you should let them know about this. They were acting like “WE KNOW EVERYTHING”
  5. mentisflatus likes this
  6. mathdumlao likes this
  7. geremoi likes this
  8. theworldismylaboratory reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  9. flyfreebutterflyconfetti likes this
  10. denvers likes this
  11. juanrepublic likes this
  12. halfofacrazybitch reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  13. chestpeanuts said: then there is this weird proposal to enclosed the entire baywalk through a certain dike system to prevent trash to enter and converting the baywalk/seawall part to a beach
  14. perfect-stapler reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  15. perfect-stapler likes this
  16. litratonijuan likes this
  17. engrbigmac reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  18. girl-in-a-well likes this
  19. jamesvergara likes this
  20. 5inbinary likes this
  21. dyusipprutgum reblogged this from theurbanhistorian
  22. ishbinclaris likes this
  23. theurbanhistorian posted this